Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!
From: owl (owl_at_moonlite.com)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Martin Brown: "Re: Can ozone levels be traced over time?"
- Previous message: Athiest 4 Bush: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- In reply to: boo_at_fractalfreak.com: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Reply: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Reply: Joshua Halpern: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Reply: boo_at_fractalfreak.com: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:48:38 -0500
On 12 Feb 2005 04:36:47 -0800, boo@fractalfreak.com wrote:
>
>BillC wrote:
>
>>
>> You're the fool, especially if you think the industrialized world is
>going
>> to shut down on the basis of what are probably minor fluctuation that
>may or
>> may not be be partly influenced by manmade emissions.
>>
>
>(...)
>
>Of course, people aren't going to stop burning fossils fuels -
>that is until they are gone, and that end is now in sight.
No it's not. Not even close. They're discovering new fields at the
same pace they always have. New technology is opening up access to
more fields. Other technologies are unlocking tar sands.
http://www.nanotech-now.com/nanocatalysis-fossil-fuels-report.htm
>Global production of oil, if it isn't peaking already,
>will likely peak within the decade.
Not inside the current paradigm. China and India are in the take-off
stages of 'I Luv My Car':
http://biz.yahoo.com/cnw/041230/global_auto_sales_1.html
>Coal and natural gas aren't far behind. The huge increases in demand in China
>and India will assure the peak arrives sooner than you
>might imagine.
Wishful thinking.
> (increased consumption) ... Something that's
>not possible as global production is currently maxed out.
No such thing. Iraqi oil fields alone are running at minimum
production. There's a new play off the SE coast of India, expanding
fields along the east bank of the Nile, the north Alaska slope on
hold.
>We will likely double the current CO2 level before fossil fuels
>became so scarce as to be irrelevant. We shall see what becomes
>of our 'industrialized world' at that point.
Comic-book logic guy. You've fictioned a scenario to reach the end of
a story. "And they lived headedly every after."
>You're the fool for not being willing to admit
>the consequences of this explosive doubling of the CO2
>level may be catastrophic.
The plodding increase of 2 ppm each year (guessing the Kyoto and
increased use keep current trends steady) means the doubling point is
reached in 80 years.
Instead of the catastrophe warning, how about thinking of the dirty,
coughing, stinky, garbage-littered, world that we live in between here
and there?
>-Eric B
- Next message: Martin Brown: "Re: Can ozone levels be traced over time?"
- Previous message: Athiest 4 Bush: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- In reply to: boo_at_fractalfreak.com: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Reply: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Reply: Joshua Halpern: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Reply: boo_at_fractalfreak.com: "Re: January was WARMEST in the 126-year land record!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]