Re: Isn't this ob illegal?
- From: James Korman <jkorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 04:32:37 GMT
On 5 Sep 2005 12:01:54 -0700, famartin1@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>KUNV 051702Z AUTO 36005KT 10SM BKN046 SCT050 23/11 A3041 RMK AO2=
>
>=====
>Raymond C. Martin, Jr.
>Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/
>New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/
>Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/
KUNV 051702Z AUTO 36005KT 10SM BKN046 SCT050 23/11 A3041 RMK AO2=
?????????????
Had to look at it for a second to figure out what you meant.
at least according to the FMH-1
9.5.2 Layer Amount.
The amount of sky cover reported for each layer shall be based on
the summation layer amount for that layer. The amount shall be
reported using the reportable contractions given in Table 9-2.
Jim
.
- References:
- Isn't this ob illegal?
- From: famartin1
- Isn't this ob illegal?
- Prev by Date: Cannot Remember Hurricane Camille
- Next by Date: Re: Question for the Netherlands
- Previous by thread: Isn't this ob illegal?
- Next by thread: Katrina Aerial Survey Photos
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
