Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- From: Charles <ckraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:51:24 GMT
On 15 Apr 2006 06:19:27 -0700, "Weatherlawyer"
<Weatherlawyer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(snip)
(snip)
The arrays were able to detect frequencies of -10 to +10 htz IIRC. The
fequency of earthquakes and nuclear explosions on the other side of the
globe. Not so necessary now there is only Iranian hospita XRay machines
and Iraqi portable toilettes to worry about.
Is there some meaningful definition for -10 Hz?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- From: Dan Mckenna
- Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- References:
- HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- From: BOB
- Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- From: Weatherlawyer
- HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- Prev by Date: Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- Next by Date: Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- Previous by thread: Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- Next by thread: Re: HAARP? Dare any comment please?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|