Re: Take Their Word For It

From: "Claudius Denk" <cladiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:45:14 GMT

<dimndsonmywndshld@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146430647.035047.309030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Claudius Denk wrote:

And the best lab evidence indicate that there is not
much difference between the thermal properties of these molecules as
compared to
CO2.

wrong, see discussion re. short wave/long wave radiation...for example
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/wea00/wea00082.htm

Uh. There's nothing on this website that addresses the issue I presented.
Replacing the word radiative for thermal doesn't make much difference.
We're still expected to take their word for it.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Take Their Word For It
  - From: Scott L

Next by Date: Re: Take Their Word For It
Next by thread: Re: Take Their Word For It
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Take Their Word For It
... Claudius Denk wrote: ... much difference between the thermal properties of these molecules as compared to ... There's nothing on this website that addresses the issue I presented. ...
(sci.geo.meteorology)
Re: Take Their Word For It
... Claudius Denk wrote: ... much difference between the thermal properties of these molecules as compared to ... CO2. ...
(sci.geo.meteorology)