Re: Take Their Word For It

hfrarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (I R A Darth Aggie) writes:

On Tue, 02 May 2006 19:21:09 GMT,
Claudius Denk <cladiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, in
<FiO5g.64590$_S7.64291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+
+ "I R A Darth Aggie" <hfrarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
+
+ > Not any that I have. Are you talking about Brownian motion?
+
+ Follow the thread of the same name on sci.environment

Ummm...no. I'm not subscribed to that newsgroup, nor will I subscribe
to that newsgroup. In fact, I kill file postings that are crossposted
into that newsgroup.

I can understand that decision. That would preclude you from having
seen my earlier post where I pointed out that Denk (who until recently was
posting as Jim McGinn) has been confusing terms there, too. I cross-posted
that to sci.environment.


So, I guess we're stuck. You won't provide a definition, my
dictionaries won't provide a definition, and I refuse to go to one
newsgroup that you suggest will make all clear.

It won't help. He refuses to provide definitions there, too.


I don't suppose you'll suggest just _taking your word for it_?

Probably not. He'll just tell you he won't educate you, you're a
whacko, etc. The typical Usenet troll/paid shill crap that you've probably
already decided isn't worth reading in sci.environment.

Back to your regularly-scheduled newsgroup....

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Take Their Word For It
    ... I kill file postings that are crossposted ... into that newsgroup. ... posting as Jim McGinn) has been confusing terms there, ... and I refuse to go to one ...
    (sci.geo.meteorology)
  • Re: Take Their Word For It
    ... Claudius Denk, in ... Are you talking about Brownian motion? ... I'm not subscribed to that newsgroup, ... Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC ...
    (sci.geo.meteorology)