Re: Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- From: Pedro Sanchez <Dr.PedroSanchez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:30:18 -0400
On 5 Jun 2006 15:29:39 GMT, hfrarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (I R A Darth
Aggie) wrote:
March and April (an January, to a less extent) where busy and well
above the three year average those months. Conversely, May was quiet.
So, year-to-date, 2006 is more active than 2005, but on par with 2004
and 2003.
I guess a person can't really appreciate severe weather unless they're
in it or really close to it.
I.E. nothing big has happened near me so things must be less frequent.
Yeah, I've made that error.
THANKS for your reply
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- From: I R A Darth Aggie
- Re: Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- References:
- Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- From: Pedro Sanchez
- Re: Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- From: I R A Darth Aggie
- Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- Prev by Date: Re: Protecting Computers from Hurricanes
- Next by Date: Re: Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- Previous by thread: Re: Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- Next by thread: Re: Mild Severe Weather [so far]? Myth or truth?
- Index(es):