Re: AGW IS STILL A SCAM
- From: Rodney Blackall <rblackall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:57:20 +0100
In article <1162824629.506669.176610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<tom-bolger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Therefore we can conclude that the that the extra heat reaching the
earth's surface due to the reduction in aerosols is more than sufficient
to cause all the warming that occurred during the 1990s. There is no room
whatsoever for any warming by CO2, All the warming during the 1990s could
have been caused by the the reduction in aerosols.
In that case are you suggesting ...
(a) CO2 has not increased markedly in the last 100 years (Hawaii figures are
false) or
(b) CO2 is not a greenhouse gas?
Last I heard was that aerosols had NOT yet started to decrease: radiation
data from old, still working, geostationary satellites must allow for their
drift away from their original longitude.
--
Rodney Blackall (retired meteorologist)(BSc, FRMetS, MRI)
Buckingham, ENGLAND
Using Acorn SA-RPC, OS 4.02 with ANT INS and Pluto 3.03j
.
- Prev by Date: Temperature and time
- Next by Date: PhD positions available for glacier mass balance studies at UNBC (Canada)
- Previous by thread: Temperature and time
- Next by thread: PhD positions available for glacier mass balance studies at UNBC (Canada)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
