Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them

From: "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bialek@xxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:53:52 +0200

"Ken Johnson" <KenCJohnson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
news:1188879972.545893.26010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sep 4, 2:06 pm, Crackles McFarly <Ireland...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Since trees hold large amounts of CO2, we should burn every tree we
can.

Tree huggers are actually killing us.

Burning them releases the CO2 back into the atmosphere faster than
decay of the dead tree would.

But the burning (open fire) radiate the heat into space and back SO2 and fly
ash (both of them are the nutrient for plants) uniformly to soil..
S*

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them
  - From: Crackles McFarly

References:
- Trees hold CO2, burn them
  - From: Crackles McFarly
- Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them
  - From: Ken Johnson

Prev by Date: Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them
Next by Date: Re: My car gets 17 MPG
Previous by thread: Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them
Next by thread: Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them
... Tree huggers are actually killing us. ... decay of the dead tree would. ... Ken Johnson ...
(sci.geo.meteorology)
Re: Eco-towns
... The other big benefit of the new plant being installed is that they'll ... be burning more fuel from renewable sources rather than dinosaur bones ... and that'll also give the tree huggers a bit of a stiff one. ...
(uk.rec.motorcycles)
Re: Trees hold CO2, burn them
... Tree huggers are actually killing us. ... decay of the dead tree would. ... But the burning radiate the heat into space and back SO2 and fly ...
(sci.geo.meteorology)