Re: This is a politics newsgroup now.
- From: dave <nothere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:42:11 -0800
I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:03:34 -0500,You watch too much TV. There are not two sides to a fact.
Robert Blass <blame@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, in
<etris3dhuffcknuvlekgqutkkq53kih22o@xxxxxxx> wrote:
+ This is no longer a science newsgroup because of all the political
+ debates regarding global warming.
To call them "debates" is generous. Neither side is willing to consider
the possibility that the other side might actually have a point. It's all
about yelling, screaming, throwing chairs and posturing.
That was evident when the AGW crowd rushed forth to claim that the
"debate" was over, and that people should be stripped of the
credentials, or put in jail, for questioning their point of view.
All you need to do is killfile anything posted to more than 3 newsgroups.
In slrn, it looks like this:
%BOS
% Crosspostings.
[*]
Score:: -9999
Newsgroups: .*,.*,.*
%EOS
I don't see any of the bovine scatology.
.
- References:
- This is a politics newsgroup now.
- From: Robert Blass
- This is a politics newsgroup now.
- Prev by Date: Re: This is a politics newsgroup now.
- Next by Date: Airborne Bacteria Make It Rain
- Previous by thread: Re: This is a politics newsgroup now.
- Next by thread: Re: This is a politics newsgroup now.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading