Re: DECISION TIME ON LORAN
From: Steven Shelikoff (shelikoff_at_yawho.com)
Date: 06/16/04
- Next message: Fred: "Re: 76CS -- not my favorite GPSR (a bit lengthy)"
- Previous message: Robin Capper: "Re: GPS for a bike tour"
- In reply to: Louis Cohen: "Re: DECISION TIME ON LORAN"
- Next in thread: Carsten Kurz: "Re: DECISION TIME ON LORAN"
- Reply: Carsten Kurz: "Re: DECISION TIME ON LORAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:20:56 GMT
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:53:48 -0700, "Louis Cohen"
<louiscohen@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>I thought loran was used for coastal navigation by ships - was it used by
>aircraft as well?
LORAN can work very well for aircraft because, while the absolute
accuracy isn't nearly as good as GPS, the repeatable precision is very
good, maybe even better than unaugmented GPS. So while LORAN can't tell
you as well as GPS exactly where you are in lat/lon, it can get you to a
known position (like the end of a runway) just as good as GPS. And
that's current LORAN with current receivers, not with all the
improvements the article mentioned.
Steve
- Next message: Fred: "Re: 76CS -- not my favorite GPSR (a bit lengthy)"
- Previous message: Robin Capper: "Re: GPS for a bike tour"
- In reply to: Louis Cohen: "Re: DECISION TIME ON LORAN"
- Next in thread: Carsten Kurz: "Re: DECISION TIME ON LORAN"
- Reply: Carsten Kurz: "Re: DECISION TIME ON LORAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|