Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?
From: Bert Hyman (bert_at_visi.com)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: Gary S.: "Re: Barometric altimeter calibration"
- Previous message: the Moderator: "Re: Barometric altimeter calibration"
- Next in thread: Carsten Kurz: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Reply: Carsten Kurz: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Reply: Peter: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Reply: HH: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jul 2004 19:13:31 GMT
I have a Garmin eMap that's a few years old and while I'm not quite
ready to replace it, I still look at the new models from time to
time.
Other than additional user features, some of which might actually be
useful to me, are there any non-visible improvments, such as better
receivers, better antennas, faster, more accurate position
computatation, etc?
-- Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@visi.com
- Next message: Gary S.: "Re: Barometric altimeter calibration"
- Previous message: the Moderator: "Re: Barometric altimeter calibration"
- Next in thread: Carsten Kurz: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Reply: Carsten Kurz: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Reply: Peter: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Reply: HH: "Re: Better RF performance, etc. in current crop of GPS receivers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]