Re: Why are some GPSs so much better than others?
From: Randolph J. Herber (herber_at_dcdrjh.fnal.gov)
Date: 08/04/04
- Next message: Carsten Kurz: "Re: Wild position swings with a Garmin eTrex Legend"
- Previous message: Dale DePriest: "Re: INDOOR Positioning: New Solutions for Challenging Applications"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Peter: "Why are some GPSs so much better than others?"
- Next in thread: HH: "Re: Why are some GPSs so much better than others?"
- Reply: HH: "Re: Why are some GPSs so much better than others?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Aug 2004 16:46:15 GMT
In article <7ub1h01e3e473vvresa6b3oqqe69hvh68p@4ax.com>,
Peter <peter@no-spam-please-6644.co.uk> wrote:
[SNIP of material to which I am not responding]
>I also wonder what is the point of a 12-channel GPS when most of the
>time there are 8 or fewer satellites in the sky.
>Peter.
>Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail.
>E-mail replies to peter4400@peter2000XY.co.uk but remove the X and the Y.
>Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary.
Rhetorical question: why have more than one channel when
the receiver can switch between the satellites rapidly
(e.g., the early Garmin receivers)?
1) There can be fourteen GPS satellites above the mask
horizon at one time at the present time. In my
experience, with a number of Garmin receivers made over
the last decade, under field conditions without external
antennas, eleven satellites is actually quite common.
2) The WAAS satellites share channels with the GPS satellites.
There generally are two visible in many regions of the
world and in the future there may be even more.
3) If Galileo is successful (and I assume it will, if
for no other reason than European pride) as many
as thirty satellites may be above the mask horizon
at one time.
4) Spare channels can be used for signal acquisition of
GPS, WAAS, Galileo, EGNOS (the Galileo equivalent to
WAAS) satellites about to come above the mask horizon, to
anticipate Doppler frequency shift effect, etc. They
also can be used during the initialization of the
receiver at power-up to massively search for single
satellites until enough have been found to acquire
ephemeris, almanac and rough time, location, velocity
and acceleration data to do a full solution acquisition.
5) Since the channels share the receiver radio frequency
front-end, adding channels is relatively cheap as only
computing resources need to be added to the signal
demodulation section of the receiver. With massively
parallel correlators (channels), thousands and even
hundreds of thousands of channel are practical
(even at cell phone prices). Such massively parallel
correlators (channels) permit signal acquisition and
maintenance even in weak and radio-noisy environments
(e.g., inside indoor shopping malls and on battle
fields with jammers operating).
http://www.clickerado.com/g/gps/positioning.htm
6) Locations requiring extremely reliable and precise
solutions may provide ground transmitters of weak
GPS/Galileo-like signals from several locations
near the location requiring such signals to provide
additional navigation signals, differential corrections
and declarations about the quality of all GPS/Galileo-like
signals usable at that location (LAAS ). These additional
signals also require channels.
7) Consumer grade 16 channel receivers exist. E.g.:
http://www.highpointscientific.com/meade.html
http://www.celestron.com/prod_pgs/tel/nx_gps_table.htm
http://www.aircotec.net/xctrainer.htm
Randolph J. Herber, herber@dcdrjh.fnal.gov, +1 630 840 2966, CD/CDFTF PK-149F,
Mail Stop 318, Fermilab, Kirk & Pine Rds., PO Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510-0500,
USA. (Speaking for myself and not for US, US DOE, FNAL nor URA.) (Product,
trade, or service marks herein belong to their respective owners.)
- Next message: Carsten Kurz: "Re: Wild position swings with a Garmin eTrex Legend"
- Previous message: Dale DePriest: "Re: INDOOR Positioning: New Solutions for Challenging Applications"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Peter: "Why are some GPSs so much better than others?"
- Next in thread: HH: "Re: Why are some GPSs so much better than others?"
- Reply: HH: "Re: Why are some GPSs so much better than others?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|