Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005
From: Jim Walker (walkerjd1_at_worldnet.att.net.net)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Bill Daniels: "Re: GPS and Beyond: The SatNav Transition for aviation"
- Previous message: Roger Halstead: "Re: GPS and Beyond: The SatNav Transition for aviation"
- In reply to: nospam_at_comcast.net: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Next in thread: Skramblr: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Reply: Skramblr: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Reply: R. Dale Shipp: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:50:15 GMT
I don't agree at all that Street Atlas is a toy. It is a complete
functioning GPS navigation program. I have about six thousand miles of
successful navigation with it and I was really depending on it. I have used
SA 7, 2003, and 2004. DeLorme isn't perfect, but if there is a better one
out there I haven't found it.
-- Jim Walker Northern Virginia <nospam@comcast.net> wrote in message news:q5gnk0lkf3f8ltnj9qbbprl2a8dokkokp3@4ax.com... > On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:01:34 GMT, "J&D Schnoor" > <jimdianes@frontiernet.net> wrote: > > >I have narrowed my choices of USB GPS devices to Microsoft Streets & Trips > >with GPS Locator or Delorme Eathmate GPS receiver with Street Atlas USA > >2005. Since Microsoft has just got into the GPS game, reviews seem hard to > >come by. From what I have read so far, however, it seems as if the > >Earthmate beats the Microsoft bundle hands down. Does anyone know of any > >features that the Microsoft package has that the Earthmate doesn't have? > > > > Well, the MS package requires a LOT less machine to run correctly, has > a more "user friendly" interface, easier to read and more accurate > maps, and the map trails are certainly better. > > The difference between the two packages you mentioned is that > S&Tdoesn't try to be anything more than a good map with gps ability > while the SA package tries to be everything to everyone without doing > any of it very well. Neither one is perfect but if you want a good > map, get the S&T and if you just want to play with it, get the SA.
- Next message: Bill Daniels: "Re: GPS and Beyond: The SatNav Transition for aviation"
- Previous message: Roger Halstead: "Re: GPS and Beyond: The SatNav Transition for aviation"
- In reply to: nospam_at_comcast.net: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Next in thread: Skramblr: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Reply: Skramblr: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Reply: R. Dale Shipp: "Re: Microsoft Streets & Trips 2005 with GPS Locator vs. DeLorme Earthmate GPS Receiver with Street Atlas USA 2005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|