Re: Sunspots hit new highs
From: Thomas Lee Elifritz (lifeform1_at_atlantic.net)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Previous message: bdavis_at_nospamfromyou.com: "Re: VCommand Voice Navigation System vs. garmin"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Reply: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Reply: Pieter Litchfield: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Oct 2004 21:46:02 -0700
October 30, 2004
jimp@specsol-spam-sux.com wrote in message :
> In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
> > Sunspots hit new highs (Oct 27)
> > http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/10/16
> > The Sun is more active at present than it has been for over 8000 years
> > according to a new method for determining the level of sunspot activity
> > in the past. Sami Solanki of the Max Planck Institute in
> > Katlenburg-Lindau and colleagues in Finland, Germany and Switzerland
> > have developed a technique that relates the number of sunspots to the
> > concentration of carbon-14 in tree rings. However, the team insists that
> > this high level of solar activity is unlikely to be the main cause of
> > global warming (Nature 431 1084).
>
> Yeah, sure, it couldn't POSSIBLY be totally natural, uncontrollable, and
> untaxable; that doesn't get research grants.
Having trouble with the scientific evidence again, crackpot?
Or is it just science that you don't understand?
Or, are you just another bureaucrat?
Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Previous message: bdavis_at_nospamfromyou.com: "Re: VCommand Voice Navigation System vs. garmin"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Reply: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Reply: Pieter Litchfield: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|