Re: Sunspots hit new highs
From: moT (Mot_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: Darrel Goheen: "Re: Garmin 176C vs 276C : Difference In Mounts?"
- Previous message: Karl Pollak: "Re: Recarge batteries question"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Sunspots hit new highs"
- Next in thread: Boris Mohar: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 06:36:38 GMT
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:CuYfd.19015$R05.17183@attbi_s53...
> Sunspots hit new highs (Oct 27)
> http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/10/16
> The Sun is more active at present than it has been for over 8000 years
> according to a new method for determining the level of sunspot
activity
> in the past. Sami Solanki of the Max Planck Institute in
> Katlenburg-Lindau and colleagues in Finland, Germany and Switzerland
> have developed a technique that relates the number of sunspots to the
> concentration of carbon-14 in tree rings. However, the team insists
that
> this high level of solar activity is unlikely to be the main cause of
> global warming (Nature 431 1084).
>
Oh you nasty mutha fuca
- Next message: Darrel Goheen: "Re: Garmin 176C vs 276C : Difference In Mounts?"
- Previous message: Karl Pollak: "Re: Recarge batteries question"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Sunspots hit new highs"
- Next in thread: Boris Mohar: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
