Re: Terrorists win if GPS gets shut down!

From: Alan Browne (alan.browne_at_FreeLunchVideotron.ca)
Date: 12/20/04


Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:50:26 -0500

Sam Wormley wrote:

> Alan Browne wrote:
>
>> I think a deliberate shutdown of 3 days once a year would have more
>> benefit in assuring people that they can live without it!
>>
>> I'm much more affraid of missiles than a 3 day GPS outtage.
>
> Tell that to the people collecting data--animal collars, instrumented
> balloons, buoys, rail systems, truck fleets, ships, miners, human
> tracking,
> search & rescue, public transit systems, etc., etc.

Nothing you named will be so affected as to grind society to a halt or cause
injury or death. As I've said before, nothing should be designed or built using
GPS that would put life or limb in jeopardy. And any business that is
absolutely dependant on it will have to wait.

If my new lens is delayed 4 days and 1 persons life is saved, I won't be unhappy
at all. If my new lens is delayed for no reason, I'll pout a bit, but I won't
be that concerned. But I'll bet the real number is closer to one day late even
if GPS goes down for a week.

While this whole thread has been entertaining and sometimes silly, the liklihood
of such action by the US Gov't seems extremely remote. And if it does happen
the liklihood that it will cause major inconveniences for 95% of the US pop. is
near 0 IMO. The other 5% might experience some greater degrees of frustration,
and inconvenience.

My "deliberate shutdown" thought above is just to provoke some thinking. Is GPS
really that ingrained in our lives. And the answer is, really, no. And if you
believe you are at risk, then what are you doing to mitigate your personal risk
(esp. if you beleive that risk is high or likely to cause injury).

Cheers,
Alan

-- 
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.


Relevant Pages

  • Re: My theory on why the GPS argument will never be settled
    ... navigate, and how they expect them to be able to navigate. ... My guess is that MRTs worry that people will take a GPS and, with no other navigation skills, launch themselves into the wilds, assuming that the technology will bail them out in case of trouble. ... Now you can just press a button, so it's possible to bypass all of the other stuff, all of which is useful _regardless_ of whether a GPS or compass is preferred, and still have a feeling of being safe because for many ... people have different tolerances to risk, as well as different skills that affect levels of risk, so for one person to say 'this is how you should deal with risk' doesn't really work. ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Re: Basic navigational skills badly missing
    ... >assumed that you had to sit tight rather than moving around.... ... but in many places over here that risk is absent. ... >If you *had* to move around then GPS would obviously be required. ... worked on pacing alone. ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • My theory on why the GPS argument will never be settled
    ... > modern commercial aircraft navigate by GPS. ... Many people have both a car and a bike, ... this brings an added level of risk. ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown"
    ... >> I don't even think that a lot of money will be lost. ... company or agency that has integrated GPS into their ... >> A risk assessment would likely place the risk as ... >> impact would an investment in backups and workarounds be worthwhile. ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: 30 Years Since Edmund Fitgerald
    ... double screws (and the GPS) may have saved our lives. ... Lesser craft have swamped or capsized in that stuff, with the wind, the ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)