Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK
From: Oldbie (nomorecrap_at_myplace.com)
Date: 12/24/04
- Previous message: H.W. Stockman: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- Next in thread: Frank Looper: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- Reply: Frank Looper: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:50:02 -0500
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:15:40 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com>
wrote:
> See: http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/CORS/Rinex2.html
Any fool can obtain 10,000 occurences of the alphanumeric sequence
"RINEX2" on google. For example, see the first response I got.
Sam, your reference above tells me nothing about how RINEX2 data might
possible be of some use to me - or indeed to anyone except those
working with data from some European study done a decade and a half
ago. I had already read several documents on that Swiss exercise
prior to posting my question.
I would like to find out if "RINEX" data might possibly fit into a
solution for a problem I am tinkering with.
>From time to time I would like to perform topographic surveys with a
precision of approx. +/- 10 cms vertical precision far enough away
from my RTK base station that radio contact is questionable/difficult
and OTF RTK operation is unlikely to work. By topographic surveys I
mean I want to collect enough data to make a somewhat accurate contour
drawing of a potential construction site for cost estimation purposes.
I do not want to sit on any point for any length of time, and I do not
need to know the location of anything to any great precision, like
mm's or anything, so I cannot see OPUS or any of the survey data
reduction software that I have looked at so far being of any use to
me.
I suspect I might be able to do what I want by collecting data with a
rover receiver that I can later correct to an adequate level of
precision using data from my own or someone else's base station data.
But so far, after looking at OPUS, FKYKIN, TGO and a significant
number of other possibilities, I am hardly any further ahead than when
I started.
So let me rephrase my question.
Does anyone here know how to do the job I have described above because
they have actually done it and can tell me how to set up my rover to
collect the data I need, how to set up my base to collect the data I
need, what software I can get to apply the corrections to my collected
field data, and what steps I can go through if there are alternative
methods to achieve the same results I have described above?
- Previous message: H.W. Stockman: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- Next in thread: Frank Looper: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- Reply: Frank Looper: "Re: TWENTY-ONE NEW STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORS NETWORK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]