Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown"
From: Alan Browne (alan.browne_at_FreeLunchVideotron.ca)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: Stichting ST: "Re: Sumatra 100 foot shift"
- Previous message: Charlie Ih: "Re: Honda navigation system"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown""
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown""
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:50:11 -0500
Mxsmanic wrote:
> Alan Browne writes:
>
>
>>All ships carry 2 or three radars for navigation and collision avoidance.
>
>
> Apparently they must carry more than that, now.
No. That's all they carried before.
>
>
>>Unlike aircraft, ships can reduce their speed considerably in
>>waters where there is more traffic.
>
>
> Unlike aircraft, ships weigh 100,000 tons and will continue to coast
> unstoppably for miles after being "stopped." Just turning large ships
> can be a challenge.
And GPS magically can stop a ship? Wow! I didn't know that!
-- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
- Next message: Stichting ST: "Re: Sumatra 100 foot shift"
- Previous message: Charlie Ih: "Re: Honda navigation system"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown""
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown""
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Clarification about the term "GPS Shutdown""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|