Re: American Airlines response
From: Isaac Wingfield (isw_at_witzend.com)
Date: 01/16/05
- Next message: Diverhank: "Re: ipass & gps"
- Previous message: Diverhank: "Re: American Airlines response"
- In reply to: H.W. Stockman: "Re: American Airlines response"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: American Airlines response"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: American Airlines response"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:10:04 -0800
In article <imcGd.7577$pZ4.7259@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"H.W. Stockman" <stockman3@earth-REMOVE_THIS-link.net> wrote:
--snippage--
> Perhaps that is an even greater fear of the airlines; if they allow personal
> GPS in flight, sooner or later, the FAA will allow cell phones. The 5 hours
> on a plane could go from boring to miserable.
My understanding is that cell phones at 35,000 feet can access far too
many cells at the same time and with nearly identical signal strengths,
and move from cell to cell much faster than the system is designed for.
It's not about "allowing"; it's about "working".
Isaac
- Next message: Diverhank: "Re: ipass & gps"
- Previous message: Diverhank: "Re: American Airlines response"
- In reply to: H.W. Stockman: "Re: American Airlines response"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: American Airlines response"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: American Airlines response"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|