Re: Is there a moderator?
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: quanghoc: "Re: Which Compact Flash for StreetPilot 2610?"
- Previous message: Andy: "Re: Is there a moderator?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Top_Poster_at_BITNET.edu: "Re: Re: Is there a moderator?"
- Next in thread: Scott en Aztlán: "Re: Is there a moderator?"
- Reply: Happy Trails: "Re: Is there a moderator?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 03:44:31 GMT
Top_Poster@BITNET.edu wrote:
> You guys need to get over this Top-Post/Bottom Post BullSh*t.
>
> Top posting lets people who are following the thread read the updates
> WITHOUT having to scroll down through an ever increasing bunch of old
> stuff OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER and... and, NO, folks
> DON'T clip out older stuff, they just reply and resend it all, almost
> every time!
>
> It is the DEFAULT AND ONLY ACTION in Agent. It is the DEFAULT and
> ONLY ACTION in email, too. It is THE WAY to do it and has been since
> before the Internet existed. Maybe you were never on BitNet. For
> those not in the know, it was a collection of RSCS programs with
> routing tables to send email in and out of the master server/switcher
> in the northeast. I cannot remember the school it was in right now.
> It may come to me. It may have been Cornell but I am not sure. It
> has been a lot of years! You just came charging in at the last moment
> and blasting people for doing it right!
>
> TOP POSTING SAVES TIME.
>
> TOP POSTING SAVES HAVING TO SWITCH WINDOWS BACK AND FORTH TO/FROM THE
> SUBJECTS LIST WINDOW.
>
> DO IT ALL YOU WANT! IT IS FAR SUPERIOR!!!
>
> If you don't like top posting, then PLEASE SCROLL TO THE BOTTOM OF
> EVER POST, then SCROLL UP THE POST and FINALLY, when you get to the
> top (WHERE YOU STARTED), read the new information. And BE SURE TO DO
> THIS EVERY TIME YOU READ ANY POST ON THE INTERNET. Please scroll to
> the bottom, EVERY TIME. Remember!
>
> THEN, and ONLY THEN, will you realize how VERY STUPID bottom posting
> is! It is a HORRIBLE WASTE OF TIME and NOT THE DEFAULT ACTION of some
> (all?) USENET agent programs.
>
> Bottom Posters, here's how to handle top posting so you will feel
> better about it:
>
> GET OVER IT and HANDLE IT (make it feel like bottom posting) by
> SCROLLING TO THE BOTTOM, THEN SCROLL UP, SCREEN BY SCREEN until you
> come to the top and, finally, read the new information in the proper
> place, where it belongs. And you will feel right since you scrolled
> through all the repeated stuff on every post. Enjoy top posting and
> all the stupid scrolling from the bottom to the top EVERY POST.
>
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:17:17 +0000, in sci.geo.satellite-nav Brian
> Morrison <scrapspam@fenrir.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>Mark C wrote:
>>
>>>I'd like to post a question on the usenet, but wanted to check with a
>>>moderator first.
>>
>>Usenet only has moderation for groups that want it, this is normally
>>decided during the process of setting up the group which is a formal
>>process unless in the alt. hierarchy.
>>
>>
>>>I'm wanting to write a gps software program (commercialy) but before I
>>>start, would like to post a thread/take a survey to get gps users input
>>>about what they would like in a program, features, etc. SUch input could be
>>>most helpful.
>>
>>I'm sure people here will be very happy to make suggestions.
>>
>>
>>>However I respect the board and don't want to use them for commercial
>>>purposes that aren't allowed.
>>>
>>>Is this something that I can do?
>>
>>Yes. But firstly, please don't top post, it makes replies hard to read.
>>The correct method is to respond in sequence and to trim quoted material
>>down to that required to establish context. About the only time that top
>>posting is OK is when you wish to bring attention to something you've
>>seen and then paste in the other information after the "Hey look at
>>this" introduction.
>>
>>I would suggest that you find out a bit more about Usenet in general and
>>specifically that you search for and read the charter for the groups you
>>wish to post in so that you know what is allowed and what is not. Not
>>all groups have a charter, and some groups will enforce it in a more lax
>>fashion than others. In some groups (especially high traffic groups) off
>>topic postings will attract a very rapid and vociferous response from
>>people who view their time as precious.
>>
>>It's important to realise that abuse *of* Usenet and abuse *on* Usenet
>>are very different things, the former is not permitted because it
>>affects the infrastructure of passing articles around the news servers
>>and the latter is permitted providing that it does not violate the laws
>>of the country where the article is posted nor the AUP of the ISP that
>>the poster uses for their service.
>
>
>
*plonk*
- Next message: quanghoc: "Re: Which Compact Flash for StreetPilot 2610?"
- Previous message: Andy: "Re: Is there a moderator?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Top_Poster_at_BITNET.edu: "Re: Re: Is there a moderator?"
- Next in thread: Scott en Aztlán: "Re: Is there a moderator?"
- Reply: Happy Trails: "Re: Is there a moderator?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|