Re: TomTom Go opinions?
From: AR (araina.usenet_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Dennis Pogson: "Re: pseudorange"
- Previous message: AR: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Anthony R. Gold: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- Next in thread: Anthony R. Gold: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Anthony R. Gold: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:42:30 -0500
Tony,
What's this version 5 you refer to?
Thanks.
-AR
"Anthony R. Gold" <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wrote in message
news:u7ma31179qj944jbenbndb7hvcgb5ebmcm@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:07:42 -0500, "AR" <araina-usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I am torn between the 2610 and the GO. I am inclined to buy the GO but I
> > realize after reading the user reviews on Amazon that it has a glare
> > problem.
> >
> > Now, that said, it can be fixed by buying a anti-glare protector.
> >
> > But how does it stack up otherwise? Has anyone used it within N.America?
Do
> > you regret the purchase? Would buy again?
>
> What that glare complaint disguises is what I consider to be the biggest
> problem with he TomTom GO, that you NEED to see the screen for navigation.
> That is not an issue if you are accompanied by a passenger who can read
> the screen and assist, but I find it downright dangerous when a driver is
> navigating themself.
>
> The unit does give timely voice warnings when approaching turns and
> junctions but the voice directions are very poor and often directly wrong
> when giving junction navigation instructions, such as "keep left" when
> maybe the exact opposite is true.
>
> The accurate detailed junction turn directions (except for roundabout
> rotary junctions when they are quite adequate) are only given on the
> screen in coloured markings on the 3-D images of the roads. And even then
> the screen does not give the most obvious information needed by the driver
> of exactly which road sign markings to follow, unlike say the Garmin which
> is excellent in this respect.
>
> I have seen some advanced screen shots of Version 5 and it appears that
> what I find to be this major deficiency has been very greatly improved,
> but I haven't yet seen the real thing.
>
> I have driven with the TomTom GO in Europe and the USA and, mainly in view
> of some promised improvements in Version 5, I would buy it again.
>
> Tony
- Next message: Dennis Pogson: "Re: pseudorange"
- Previous message: AR: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Anthony R. Gold: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- Next in thread: Anthony R. Gold: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Anthony R. Gold: "Re: TomTom Go opinions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|