Re: Garmin 2610 -- SHOCKING results from "slow" 1GB CF card
- From: gomez <adams_gomez@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 07:32:38 +0100
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:38:54 -0400, Steven Shelikoff
<shelikoff@xxxxxxxxx> dropped the following oil-slick:
>
>Yup. But the write time is the more significant amount of time for a
>fast PC. And you did ask what relevance write speed has, so I answered.
Fair enough.
>Also, I upload more than once a year if I want to use the card for my
>camera and then switch it back to the GPS. I have a 2GB, 1GB, 256MB, a
>host of 128's and smaller down to 32MB that I swap around for my current
>needs.
That would have been a good answer except given the current low price
of 2GB cards, I am surprised you do not have one dedicated to use in
your 2610. Maybe if you only travelled occasionally to/from Europe
but even then what's GBP100 compared to a return air fair?
I am actually now using smaller (256MB) cards as low value currency
to swap for other cheap bits of computer kit, as they are excess to my
requirements.
--
gomez
(not is hot to reply)
"The progress of the kart is more important than its direction"
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: which GPS is least affected by high buildings in a narrow street?
- Next by Date: Re: which GPS is least affected by high buildings in a narrow street?
- Previous by thread: Re: Garmin 2610 -- SHOCKING results from "slow" 1GB CF card
- Next by thread: Re: Garmin 2610 -- SHOCKING results from "slow" 1GB CF card
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
