Re: Why Dr.?



In article <3fqee1p4a6dsfo5f2srr5j82icduftvag4@xxxxxxx>, Gary S.
<Idontwantspam@net> wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:32:14 -0400, Hugh Scott <me@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >In article <U_ydnYfhj-97QH7fRVnyvA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Lee
> ><davidlee_malvern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> jim_gps wrote...
> >> > FWIIW: As I understand it Dr is different to Prof, you are awarded the
> >> > "Dr" title to replace Mr when you get a higher degree, Prof is *only* a
> >> > title you get with work and when you retire you lose it again - just
> >> > like Major, or Rev etc.
> >>
> >> Back on topic - my two pennorth is that I would only consider signing
> >> myself
> >> as Dr if I had made a specific point that is justified largely by my
> >> qualifications or research experience in the field - in other words the
> >> title is relevant to the authority of the posting. In a GPS forum this is
> >> seldom likely to be the case (at least not for me) and the use of the
> >> title
> >> would simply be pretentious. Most (on-topic) threads are of the nature of
> >> technical discussions over a pint or a coffee where first-name signatures
> >> are most appropriate
> >>
> >> David
>
> >Exactly my sentiments, David. I couldn't agree with you more.
>
> I can see and support when a person with a PhD references that _when_
> relevant to the topic. This is more or less a technical forum, and
> there are a few times where a relevant PhD might reinforce the
> statements of the person making them.
>
> The vast majority of people I know who have earned a PhD will never
> use it outside an academic setting, or their professional setting.
> With some, you have to know them a quite while before it even comes up
> in conversation.
>
> IMO, a PhD indicates accomplishment in a particular, often
> specialized, field. It does not speak to that person's knowledge or
> ability in a different field.
>
> But there are a few out there who constantly use the PhD, in every
> possible context and topic. It seems to stem from insecurity, and can
> be used as a form of intellectual bullying. Usenet is not immune.
>
> Happy trails,
> Gary (net.yogi.bear)

You are right about this.

Why do you think that these posters in this group have a PhD? I'll bet
that they are medical doctors. Many think that it is a title, such as
being knighted by the Queen, and believe they need to use it outside of
their professional area.

--
Hugh Scott
Augusta, GA WGS84 N33° 32.495 W82°04.389
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Master Thesis Topic
    ... visual comfort by analyzing the users' behaviour. ... I did my thesis at the Solar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory ... David Lindelöf, PhD ...
    (comp.home.automation)
  • Re: Why Dr.?
    ... >Exactly my sentiments, David. ... I can see and support when a person with a PhD references that _when_ ... use it outside an academic setting, ... be used as a form of intellectual bullying. ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: MP3 distortion
    ... Doug, your field of expertise is chemistry, whereas David has a PhD in ... Well, I guess that explians it: I have a PhD in science, he has one in ... (Not to demean, of course, any mathematical component to his ... Well I'm sure that David would be able to defend himself against such ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Overnight Ratings - Monday 3/20/06
    ... And so the word went out from David: ... Against a plumber, oh, and an architect, both with a PhD ... from Al Yankovic's "I Lost On Jeopardy" ...
    (rec.arts.tv)
  • Re: Why Dr.?
    ... > use it outside an academic setting, ... I work at a company where the vast majority of the engineers have MS ... PhD" internally, and have never heard a PhD someone called "Dr." ... > be used as a form of intellectual bullying. ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)