Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- From: Filip Biljecki <filip.biljecki_noSPAM@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:02:41 +0200
Ron Lee wrote:
Filip Biljecki <filip.biljecki.xy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't get it.
Galileo was announced as a much better system then GPS. We are always looking for something better, aren't we?
Explain to me who Galileo alone will be better for you. Also indicate if you will pay for some of the proposed Galileo features that are fee-based.
Finally, using that information, if you had to choose between GPS and Galileo, which would you pick and why.
When evaluating against GPS, use a modernized GPS with two additional civil frequencies...both of which are free (total of three).
Ron Lee
Few years ago, Galileo was announced in Europe as a revolution. In that time I was unable to find more information about it, but I remember that the pluses for it were much better signal, higher accuracy and smaller and cheaper devices. For the last few years I didn't find much about it so I am not sure am I correct. The last news I remember was the crash of ArianneV i French Guayana- so you can imagine how much passed from it.
Sorry if I am wrong...
But I think that the U.S. did a big propaganda against it because they're concerned about it. But thumbs up for both!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- From: Ron Lee
- Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- References:
- EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- From: Dennis Pogson
- Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- From: Filip Biljecki
- Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- From: Ron Lee
- EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- Prev by Date: Re: Garmin VISTA C, NMEA?
- Next by Date: Re: WARNING
- Previous by thread: Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- Next by thread: Re: EU satellite project Galileo faces fund crunch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|