Re: Galileo paranoia?
- From: nospamronlee@xxxxxxxxxx (Ron Lee)
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:36:44 GMT
Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RoJ wrote:
I found this whilst looking for Galileo proposed accuracy, below.
Is it just my nasty suspicious mind, but are we being told -
No matter whether Galileo satellites have greater accuracy or not,
they will be 'competitive' - ie no better than - existing gps?
Are we still going to be stuck with +/- 15-20 m accuracy?
The GNSS state-of-the-art is just under a meter using two
frequency signals without augmentation. That will be true
for all three impementations: Galileo, GPS and Glonass.
Sam, please clarify your "meter" value. I believe you are referring
to the output navigation signal error and not end user position
accuracy.
Ron Lee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Galileo paranoia?
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Galileo paranoia?
- References:
- Galileo paranoia?
- From: RoJ
- Re: Galileo paranoia?
- From: Sam Wormley
- Galileo paranoia?
- Prev by Date: ERDAS, max values, point type
- Next by Date: Re: Garmin 60CX question
- Previous by thread: Re: Galileo paranoia?
- Next by thread: Re: Galileo paranoia?
- Index(es):
Loading