Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- From: "Robert Elsinga =8-)" <use_robert_at_elsinga.org_as_reply_address@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 08:20:30 +0200
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 04:22:55 GMT, Phil Wheeler <w6tuh-ng7@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
So I wonder if the Quest will be as satifying in an auto environment for
permanent (vs. occasional) use.
I've been using a Quest (and Quest 2 now) since they were available in
Europe. Mostly in the car, but also hiking, occasional biking and
inside commercial airplanes.
I also once had the opportunity to use the 2610 alongside the Quest 2
in my car.
The Quest (2) is absolutely fine for in-car use. If the display glares
a little you can either turn up the backlight a bit (mine is normally
at 50%) of tilt the Quest a little. The 2610 is a bit more bulky but
also very nice, although I like the Quest formfactor more. =8-)
If you consider a Quest, you might find my Quest FAQ & HowTo pages
interesting to read beforehand: www.elsinga.net/questfaq .
Robert Elsinga =8-)
www.elsinga.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- From: Phil Wheeler
- Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- From: Bill Cotton
- Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- References:
- Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- From: Stephen Brown
- Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- From: Stephen Brown
- Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- From: Phil Wheeler
- Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: Garmin don't want to know about bugs
- Next by Date: Re: MapSource unlock query - multiple / replacement units
- Previous by thread: Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- Next by thread: Re: Quest vs. SP-III, 2610, 2620, etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
