Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:05:33 +0200
+ kc <codewarrior@xxxxxxxx>:
| When you get it back to the PC, MapSource does become a problem. I
| have a 7 Meg track which took 17 hours to gather. It takes MapSource
| over 15 minutes to open this track on my 2GHz laptop.
Oooh. Is the data format of these tracklogs known to the public, so
one could write one's own parser? Or must we wait for someone to
reverse engineer it?
--
* Harald Hanche-Olsen <URL:http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/>
- It is undesirable to believe a proposition
when there is no ground whatsoever for supposing it is true.
-- Bertrand Russell
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: kc
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- References:
- Best GPS unit for track logging?
- From: pixseal
- GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: pixseal
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: kc
- Best GPS unit for track logging?
- Prev by Date: Re: monument coordinates
- Next by Date: Re: monument coordinates
- Previous by thread: Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- Next by thread: Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- Index(es):