Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:49:01 +0200
+ Jack Erbes <jackerbes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| I guess the files are not anything as simple as ASCII text files.
|
|> [...] a 7 Meg track which took 17 hours to gather.
Assuming one trackpoint per second, that is about 120 bytes per
trackpoint. That's a lot of bytes; enough to make me wonder if they
are using an XML based format. 8-)
--
* Harald Hanche-Olsen <URL:http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/>
- It is undesirable to believe a proposition
when there is no ground whatsoever for supposing it is true.
-- Bertrand Russell
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: kc
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: Terje Mathisen
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- References:
- Best GPS unit for track logging?
- From: pixseal
- GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: pixseal
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: kc
- Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- From: Jack Erbes
- Best GPS unit for track logging?
- Prev by Date: Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- Next by Date: Re: Re: 60CX / 76CX and WAAS
- Previous by thread: Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- Next by thread: Re: GPSMAP 60Cx or 76Cx?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|