Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: "Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jul 2006 23:14:50 -0700
So, you folks either don't want to or else wouldn't dare to honestly
discuss A-11, A-14 or A-16 as having that terrific and otherwise
unavoidable look-see at Venus. Why am I not the least bit surprised.
Here's a my latest suggestion to each of those naysayers that typically
suck and blow (such as most of these Third Reich collaborating
contributors to this topic, like yourself):
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg
"Chris Krolczyk, former Smithsonian anthropologist (and an
evolutionist, obviously), does his thing outside National
Museum of Natural History. Amazingly, Krolczyk reported
meeting Tony Blair, President Bush and Rush Limbaugh inside
the tunnel. Krolczyk has since left the Smithsonian to join
Monty Pyton's Flying Circus."
However, it seems the rest of Ed Conrad's "RARE PHOTO OF FIRST MAN IN
THE MOON -- FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE" topic has also been sharing the a bit
of the actual truth and nothing but the truth.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.history/browse_frm/thread/e2b6d88aff57aa8e/1a86a2ae5fb3c491?hl=en#1a86a2ae5fb3c491
or as otherwise offered by this tpoic: "EXCLUSIVE PHOTO -- FIRST MAN IN
THE MOON"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.history/browse_frm/thread/d13e4f709535f68c/c2326bc56dc99e86?hl=en#c2326bc56dc99e86
Besides Ed Conrad's honest contributions to science and the best
available terrestrial truth; what do you folks have to say on behalf
of other intelligent life, as having been existing/coexisting on Venus?
-
Brad Guth
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: RNess
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: RNess
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- Prev by Date: Repost: June 21: Congressional Testimony Addresses Economic Significance of GPS
- Next by Date: Re: Euro GPS system
- Previous by thread: Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- Next by thread: Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|