Re: My trusted GPS failed me!



I'm sure a post like this could elicit tons of stories. I likewise have a
short one.

Several years ago my wife and I were returning to Virginia on our Gold Wing
motorcycle from somewhere in the Southwest. We had determined to ride all
the way across Texas and avoid Interstates, so I was generally using the
"shortest distance" routing function.

This worked quite well until somewhere in West Texas -- now, if you've never
been to West Texas, let me just say that the distance between any two places
is outrageously far! -- our nice two-lane road deteriorated slowly into a
gravel road and eventually into a little path that not even an SUV could
love. Miles and miles from nowhere, low on fuel, we had to turn around on
the rutted one-lane path (no small feat as I was towing an Escapade trailer)
and backtrack about 40 miles to an alternate road. We found gas at a tiny
little cafe on an intersection of two roads that disappeared in the distance
to parts unknown. I never could figure out why someone would build a
business at such a remote location. Maybe because there were others like
us?

--
Jim Beachy

<nospam.gps@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ec0e88$1b8a$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Interesting story for your enjoyment...


I am sure you've all heard about the guy who drove his expensive car
into the lake because his GPS "told him so", or numerous variations of
the story on the net... I always laughed when I read about these
things. These guys must be idiots! Little had I know that soon I'll be
the victim of such technology "glitches".
<BigSnip - Interesting Story>
The moral of the story, in city driving, the GPS may give you a
smarter route in less time than you could've done using the paper map
in unfamiliar territory, but for long trips, it's better to stick to
the old fashioned paper map route, especially in rural areas, because
you never know when the GPS calculated route might turn to "unpaved"
or just simply ends. ;)

And check road conditions before the trip. ;)

Raymond


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: TOT more about satnavs
    ... a distance of 53 miles and a time of 48 minutes. ... The average speed for the shorter route seems low, ... I now use it as a street map of the urban areas of the UK and use my ...
    (uk.tech.digital-tv)
  • Re: Mapsource Mileages Generated Are Not Accurate - Question - Why?
    ... >> Your total discrepancy is about 15%. ... >> distance and that could reduce the distance by some fraction of one ... Did the cursor appear to stay on the marked route line ... know to be 343 miles) showed 378 miles. ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: Valid Routing Query
    ... routeing points, the permitted journey takes the route of shortest ... Is that using the mileages in the timetable (which are rounded to the ... this can be checked, and the distance between stations calculated, ... miles because the timetable only shows the distance via Rotherham ...
    (uk.railway)
  • Re: Denmead -Popham 104k 21st Jan
    ... Alan Braggins wrote: ... >>you to work out the distance. ... Autoroute makes it 71-and-a-bit miles by the shortest route. ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Boston-NY-DC Route?
    ... Here's info on what I did from Boston to Philadelphia. ... Left at 4:45 and rode 108 miles before taking a rest stop at ... I stayed on Route 202 in Maine. ... resurrect my complex plan for Connecticut. ...
    (rec.bicycles.rides)