Re: Confused by DATUM's
- From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:31:47 -0600
Dominic Sexton wrote:
In article <12mh3glct0pmh04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Owlett <rowlett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
I can "see" rectil-linear (sp?) systems such as UTM having a dependence on presumed shape of earth.
Why/how would this influence a readout in latitude/longitude/elevation(assumed to be distance from earth's center of gravity).
What SIMPLE thing am I missing?
Datums can not only have a different shape for the earth but also different location for the centre of gravity and even a rotation of the co-ordinate frame.
Usually the earth shape will be defined by the ellipsoid used and the different locations will be expressed as shifts in x y and z directions. For higher accuracy transformation between datums there are also rotations around each axis and a scale factor.
I think you may have focused on my *PROBLEM*
EARTH *does have* a "center of gravity"
That's a physical "fact of life"
IIRC a satellite MUST orbit in path defined by focii of an ellipse.
If focii are equal, orbit is a circle.
So what am I missing.
Why would not lat and long ignore orbit? ?????
.
- References:
- Confused by DATUM's
- From: Richard Owlett
- Re: Confused by DATUM's
- From: Dominic Sexton
- Confused by DATUM's
- Prev by Date: Re: Confused by DATUM's
- Next by Date: Re: Confused by DATUM's
- Previous by thread: Re: Confused by DATUM's
- Next by thread: Re: Confused by DATUM's
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|