Re: SIRF STAR vs Other GPS chipsets
- From: miso@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:19:29 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 29, 5:23 pm, Ted Edwards <Ted_Espaml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ricky Raccoon wrote:
Antenna and ports:
60 CSx
external antenna option
serial port
USB port
Vista HCx
no external antenna option
USB port only
I have the 76Cx (kissing cousin to the 60). Even with the SIRF chip
set, I have encountered situations where lock was lost while driving in
narrow valleys in British Columbia. With my Garmin GA 25MCX antenna
attached I have had no loss of lock and overall better accuracy since I
get full 360 degree sky view with the antenna on the roof of the car or
in a pocket in my hat.
Ted
One advantage to the built in car nav is they use accelerometers when
the satellite signal is not sufficient.
.
- References:
- SIRF STAR vs Other GPS chipsets
- From: bharath_r
- Re: SIRF STAR vs Other GPS chipsets
- From: Otavio Exel
- Re: SIRF STAR vs Other GPS chipsets
- From: Ricky Raccoon
- Re: SIRF STAR vs Other GPS chipsets
- From: Ted Edwards
- SIRF STAR vs Other GPS chipsets
- Prev by Date: Re: what else spoils GPS signal reception
- Next by Date: Re the MI5 postings !
- Previous by thread: Re: SIRF STAR vs Other GPS chipsets
- Next by thread: GLONASS Constellation Status (December 26, 2007)
- Index(es):