Re: DGPS standards? Pleaseeeeeeeee Help
- From: designer <vittal.patil@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 02:05:17 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 6, 3:00 pm, Dominic Sexton <{d-sep...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In articleThank You for the reply....
<6f5b6c98-db6e-468e-9455-b5a58ad98...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
designer <vittal.pa...@xxxxxxxxx> writes
I have some more doubts , which are listed below. Waiting eagerly for
the replies....
1>Is SBAS based receivers (like WAAS,GAGAN,EGNOS) only for Air
navigation (Aircrafts...)???
i.e. Cant they be used for land navigation (like in mobile phones for
navigation)...???????????
WAAS was implemented by the FAA for aviation but there's no reason it
and any other SBAS can't be used for other applications. Garmin and
other manufacturers for instance include it in many of their receivers
for general use. So yes it can be used everywhere that can receive the
signals and is in the area of applicability for a system.
2>I think SBAS is also a form of DGPS. i.e. SBAS employs differential
corrections,which are
broadcast thru Geo Stationary satellites...... Am I right ???????
It is a form of DGPS but it does not broadcast corrections like
conventional DGPS. It broadcasts satellite clock & ephemeris corrections
that can be used directly but the ionospheric corrections are broadcast
as a grid over the area of applicability. The receiver collects this
grid correction data and then interpolates the corrections for its
current location.
In conventional DGPS the beacon transmits a single correction for each
satellite in view at the beacon. This correction includes satellite
clock, ephemeris and ionospheric corrections. The further the user is
from the beacon the less effective the ionospheric correction is because
the signal paths from the satellites to the user are increasingly
different to those at the beacon.
3>I am confused about which protocols to implement in my Receiver,
assuming that it is used for civil purposes
(land,sea,air navigation..), with best possible accuracy,least delay
in tracking, etc....
Please elaborate.
I have not got any clear document regarding the protocols ..... The
information I have got untill now is all wide spread kind of
i.e. confusing.
If you are actually implementing a receiver rather than using a kit from
one of the big manufacturers you have a considerable task ahead of you.
Tell us a bit more about your project and people here may be able to
offer you more specific advice which would more use to you.
We are a team of 5 engineers involved in GPS development from Scratch.
So before starting on with designing we are analysing the GPS
literature
So that the GPS Rx we will be designing will find its place in the
Navigation
Segment(Receiver).We have already prepared a MATLAB Model of basic
GPS.
Along side we are exploring GPS Addendums to keep up with the market.
Your advice will be highly appreciated.
This page might give you a useful background on the subject:
http://www.gpsinformation.org/dale/dgps.htm
--
Dominic Sexton
Some more doubts regarding RTK. I got standard regarding WAAS.
1> To have a RTK System does one need to have his own Antenna(Base
Station) other than the RTK Compatible GPS Receiver???????
i.e. Isn't it enough if We have only a RTK Compatible
receiver?????????????
2> Does RTK belong to GBAS(Ground Based Augmentation System) or
SBAS(Satellite Based ...) or is it totally different from DGPS
concept??????
3> What is the standard (signal structure and message formats) to be
referred to for RTK implementation in the GPS Receiver.
Thanks,
Vittal
.
- References:
- DGPS standards? Pleaseeeeeeeee Help
- From: designer
- Re: DGPS standards? Pleaseeeeeeeee Help
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: DGPS standards? Pleaseeeeeeeee Help
- From: designer
- Re: DGPS standards? Pleaseeeeeeeee Help
- From: Dominic Sexton
- DGPS standards? Pleaseeeeeeeee Help
- Prev by Date: Re: Locate Curves with GPS
- Next by Date: know about stemcells research....
- Previous by thread: Re: DGPS standards? Pleaseeeeeeeee Help
- Next by thread: Land Lot corner positions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|