Re: lat/lon mistakes in Columbia mishap investigation
- From: Wayne R. <wruffner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:12:40 -0500
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:06:30 -0800, "Paul Hirose"
<jvcmz89uwf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote (with clarity & insight):
"Recommendation A10. Global Positioning System receivers used for
recording the latitude / longitude of recovered debris must all be
calibrated the same way (i.e., using the same reference system), and
the latitude / longitude data should be recorded in a standardized
format."
The solution I've used is to extract data as directly as possible from
the GPS receiver straight into a GIS. Interim format can be GPX files,
for instance. In other words, keep the data native to GPS/GIS. Excel
isn't appropriate to the job in these cases.
This gets around the "calibration" problem. Pencils & spreadsheets
cause similar problems.
Rather than reporting data (haphazardly, apparently), the searchers
should've submitted their devices for data extraction by GIS types.
.
- References:
- lat/lon mistakes in Columbia mishap investigation
- From: Paul Hirose
- lat/lon mistakes in Columbia mishap investigation
- Prev by Date: Re: coord transformation with Proj4
- Next by Date: Re: lat/lon mistakes in Columbia mishap investigation
- Previous by thread: lat/lon mistakes in Columbia mishap investigation
- Next by thread: Re: lat/lon mistakes in Columbia mishap investigation
- Index(es):