Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- From: "David L. Wilson" <dwilson314@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:25:28 GMT
"claudegps" <claudegps@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:87b71971-2dfe-4552-bd77-9a1f222f22cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5 Mar, 10:28, Nick <nhop...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4 Mar, 20:49, speleo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:If the signal is good, residuals are low, dop is good (and other
params)
DOP only includes satellite geometry (not signal strength).
And you can mix all the situations like bad signal with gooddop... :)
But may be you knew that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- From: claudegps
- Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- References:
- Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- From: speleoluc
- Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- From: claudegps
- Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- From: speleoluc
- Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- From: Nick
- Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- From: claudegps
- Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- Prev by Date: Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- Next by Date: Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- Previous by thread: Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- Next by thread: Re: Roughtly converting DOP to metric error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|