Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware
usenet_at_imagenoir.com
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Bob Myers: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Previous message: usenet_at_imagenoir.com: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- In reply to: Ron W. Silvas: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Next in thread: Ron W. Silvas: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Reply: Ron W. Silvas: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:53:48 +1000
[Followups set to rec.photo.digital only]
Kibo informs me that contact@silvasdigital.com (Ron W. Silvas) stated
that:
>"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<Kw15d.11687$MS.7082@news.cpqcorp.net>...
>> "Ron W. Silvas" <contact@silvasdigital.com> wrote in message
>> news:c516aeb9.0409241202.6a4f5b6c@posting.google.com...
>> > I've found that 24-bit artifacts are quite demonstratable on both CRTs
>> > and LCDs, alike, (as can be experienced with the previously mentioned
>> > tech demo) but I believe that, if anything, they would be more
>> > noticeable on CRTs because the higher dynamic range of a CRT means that
>> > an 8-bit color channel's 256 intensity/brightness levels have that much
>> > more perceptual space to cover, right?
>>
>> I've been following this thread with interest, but a couple of
>> comments seem appropriate at this point.
>>
>> First - what "higher dynamic range" of the CRT? Neither the
>> color gamut or the contrast of the typical CRT display is
>> much different that what can be obtained with the LCD.
>> What I think the problem here really is, is a difference in the
>> response curves of the two technologies. CRTs have a very
>> nice (perceptually) "gamma" sort of response, whereas LCDs
>> have a perceptually-nastier "S-shaped" response that cannot
>> adequately be compensated for with only 8 bits per channel,
>> not if you still intend to have 8 bit/channel of perceptually linear
>> intensity control. The solution here is greater dynamic range
>> (bit depth) at the panel (i.e., at the driver level), to permit
>> compensation for the panel's response and thus present a
>> "CRT-like" 8-bit input. Fortunately, we ARE starting to see
>> 10-bit LCD drivers entering the market.
>>
>> Bob M.
>
>Hi, Mr. Myers.
>
>It might be time for me to exit from this branch of the
>discussion, as I am admittedly not very knowledgeable about the
>areas being discussed (dynamic ranges, contrast ratios,
>hardware behavioral differences between LCD and CRT
>technologies, etc.). =)
>
>My earlier comment . . .
>
>> > "I believe that, if anything, they would be more noticeable
>> > on CRTs because the higher dynamic range of a CRT . . . "
>
>. . . was a jump to a conclusion on my part–
But a correct one, in most cases. ;)
>I should have asked
>Mr. Westin if he could explain to me his comment about the
>different dynamic ranges before I commented on that. Totally
>my mistake.
Mr Westin is mistaken in his comments anyway.
> o 30-bit color's >1000 intensity levels per channel *is*
> finally enough.
> o 30-bit color display is desirable.
> o 30-bit color display on common 24-bit hardware would be a
> nice bonus, and . . .
>
>It works. On CRTs and LCDs, alike. No special hardware
>requirements. No special OS support needed.
Indeed. Did you know that the Matrox Parhelia cards already have true 30
bit resolution in hardware?
<http://www.matrox.com/mga/workstation/digital_design/products/parhelia/256mb.cfm>
-- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Bob Myers: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Previous message: usenet_at_imagenoir.com: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- In reply to: Ron W. Silvas: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Next in thread: Ron W. Silvas: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Reply: Ron W. Silvas: "Re: 30-bit Color on 24-bit Hardware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|