Re: Matlab results ok for publication??
From: Witek Jachimczyk (wjachimc_at_agentbroken.mathworks.com)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: Cingulate: "Re: DICOM and Matlab"
- Previous message: Graham Jones: "Re: Mahalanobis distance"
- In reply to: Herbert Ramoser: "Re: Matlab results ok for publication??"
- Next in thread: Pushker Pradhan: "Re: Matlab results ok for publication??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Nov 2004 17:38:15 -0500
Herbert Ramoser <herbert_DOT_ramoser@gmx.net> wrote:
> bharath wrote:
>> Could you please let me now whether matlab programs based result can be
>> considered for publication in good journals like IEEE transactions on
>> image processing.
>
> Why not? Matlab is just as good as any other programming language.
> However, you will have problems if you want to make claims about
> processing performance (e.g. necessary for Real-time imaging).
>
> -Herbert
If you are worried about performance or if you are writing image
processing code for embedded systems, consider using Video and
Image Processing blockset for Simulink. It came out this July.
It's capable of code generation including code for fixed-point
processors.
Witek
- Next message: Cingulate: "Re: DICOM and Matlab"
- Previous message: Graham Jones: "Re: Mahalanobis distance"
- In reply to: Herbert Ramoser: "Re: Matlab results ok for publication??"
- Next in thread: Pushker Pradhan: "Re: Matlab results ok for publication??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
