Re: 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- From: "Naresh" <naresh_earth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2005 01:52:05 -0800
Dear siddharth
transposing of the matrix is the biggest hurdle.
Whatever u have defined works perfect in case of Two Buffers, if i
consider it as simple and strightforward as u are suggesting!!
If its pixel(x1,y1) <-> pixel(y2, x2) and then it wont work.
U can just try it with 8x6 matrix considering the thing that u have
"contiguous memory locations". ie 48 locations. To make things simpler
u can have 2 or 3 more memory locations at disposal.
Regds,
Naresh
.
- References:
- 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- From: Naresh
- Re: 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- From: siddharth
- 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- Prev by Date: Re: 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- Next by Date: Re: 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- Previous by thread: Re: 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- Next by thread: Re: 90 Rotation in one buffer only
- Index(es):