Re: Raw JPEG Data Size

Thank you for the response. However scanning for 0xFFE9(?) does not
seem valid, I assume you mean 0xFFD9 (M_EOI).

However, with this assumption, what happens if i do not find an M_EOI?
Or is it possible for this sequence to occur in the scan?

In the situation I am in, it is very possible that 0xFFE9 will not
occur in the binary stream. In this case I want to extract as much
valid data as possible. There has to be some way to anticipate the
size of the scan, no?

-- James

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nested IF problem - help please
    ... Thanks for the response! ... I haven't used MATCH or INDEX before, but I think I get the drift. ... James ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)
  • Re: input (text) onkeypress with Japanese characters
    ... a response on this topic? ... It's quite confusing. ... James ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: Licences needed for authentication only?
    ... Wishful thinking for a reply? ... normally the response is excellent! ... Cheers, James ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: Exchange Generating 5 log files per minute
    ... you need to ensure that ALL exchange directories are excluded from AV ... > Hi many thanks for the response ... > I am pretty certain there is no regular scanning of the mailboxes but just ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.general)
  • Re: Can you decrypt this?
    ... guaranteing around a mummy like the rainbow is too causal for ... Yani to reject it. ... James won't advocate any worried races. ... Quincy never anyway pined in response to the background. ...
    (sci.crypt)