Re: not really a question

From: "Mark Andrews (The Other One)" <first.last@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:01:28 +1200

aruzinsky wrote:

I mostly read papers published in refereed journals and I suggest that you
do the same.

I would not. The OP is looking for some accessible/introductory material and frankly the research literature on image processing is not the place to find it.

--
Mark
.

Follow-Ups:
- My Mistake
  - From: aruzinsky
- Re: not really a question
  - From: Rival

References:
- not really a question
  - From: aleks . ontman
- Re: not really a question
  - From: aruzinsky

Prev by Date: I added bicubic examples. (nt)
Next by Date: Re: My image registration site
Previous by thread: Re: not really a question
Next by thread: Re: not really a question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread