Re: A derivative of a Gaussian
- From: "Shlomo" <shlomo_kashani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2006 11:49:27 -0700
Dali,
There is nothing relevant there, I couldnt even find a derivative of a
Gaussian there.
However, I was able to find the fault in the logic I presented earlier.
A very important point to note is that each of the two two-dimensional
directional derivatives has to be convolved with the image to obtain
the Norm of the gradient. However, using the separability property we
can perform two one-dimensional convolutions instead of one costly
two-dimensional convolution. That is, the first 1D derivative of a
Gaussian function convolved with a 1D Gaussian blur function convolved
with the image function, is equivalent to the image function convolved
with the first derivative of a 2D Gaussian blur function and not as I
wrongly implemented it above.
Shlomo.
Dali wrote:
Hello,
Try to look in GSL (GNU Scientific Library)
regards, Dali
.
- References:
- A derivative of a Gaussian
- From: Shlomo
- Re: A derivative of a Gaussian
- From: DrBZU
- Re: A derivative of a Gaussian
- From: Shlomo
- Re: A derivative of a Gaussian
- From: Shlomo
- Re: A derivative of a Gaussian
- From: Dali
- A derivative of a Gaussian
- Prev by Date: Re: Finding out if an image contains another?
- Next by Date: Re: Camera self-calibration matlab code
- Previous by thread: Re: A derivative of a Gaussian
- Next by thread: Illumination correction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|