Re: That's not the Answer to Your Question
- From: vectorizor <vectorizor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Apr 2007 06:32:34 -0700
On 17 Apr, 10:11, Martin Brown <|||newspam...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Apr 16, 7:43 pm, "aruzinsky" <aruzin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Absolutely, and that lack of appreciation is warranted ifblockprocessing
is unnecessary to solve the OP's speed problem. And, it is you, not I, who
is remiss for not trying to determining the exact cause of the OP's speed
problem before pontificating onblockprocessing.
You are blissfully ignorant of the technical issues and apparently
unwilling to learn.
LMAO!!
Thanks a lot Martin. I was thinking of doing that myself, but I'm too
busy right now.
As for aruzinsky's request for my original code, here is the algo
// horizontal
for row=0:width-1
.
- References:
- Block processing
- From: vectorizor
- Re: That's not the Answer to Your Question
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: That's not the Answer to Your Question
- From: aruzinsky
- Re: That's not the Answer to Your Question
- From: Martin Brown
- Block processing
- Prev by Date: Corner features in pictures using Harris detector
- Next by Date: Re: That's not the Answer to Your Question
- Previous by thread: Re: That's not the Answer to Your Question
- Next by thread: Re: That's not the Answer to Your Question
- Index(es):