Re: Histogram equalization or Convolution mask? w.r.t. computational time
- From: ImageAnalyst <imageanalyst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:28:53 -0700
On Jul 27, 5:49 pm, Ady <aiabb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hello guys,
I want to know whether histogram equalization (general one) algorithm
takes more computational time or application of the convolution mask
(say 3x3) on the image takes more time.
The size of the image is lets say not more than 400x400 pixels.
Thanks for your help in advance. :)
This seems ike a strange question. Why do you want to know? They are
completely different operations. It's not like you can choose one
method over the other to do something and want to pick the faster
one. Please supply more background.
Regards,
ImageAnalyst
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Histogram equalization or Convolution mask? w.r.t. computati
- From: aruzinsky
- Re: Histogram equalization or Convolution mask? w.r.t. computational time
- From: Martin Leese
- Re: Histogram equalization or Convolution mask? w.r.t. computati
- References:
- Prev by Date: Histogram equalization or Convolution mask? w.r.t. computational time
- Next by Date: Re: Read 8-bit grayscale JPEG image in C/C++
- Previous by thread: Histogram equalization or Convolution mask? w.r.t. computational time
- Next by thread: Re: Histogram equalization or Convolution mask? w.r.t. computational time
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|