Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: aruzinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:17:28 -0700
On Oct 10, 12:13 am, serg271 <serg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 10, 7:57 am, Martin Leese <ple...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From this we can conclude that no, it is not
an easy transform to reverse.
Just apply photoshop twirl tool in the opposite direction
Do you know this because you tried? (I don't have photoshop)
The most remarkable thing about this is that it is the child
molester's compulsion to be artsy fartsy that will probably lead to
him getting caught. Had he resisted that urge and just used
traditional coarse pixelation to blot out his face, he would probably
not be caught.
I wonder if the urge to be artsy fartsy is more prevalent in
homosexual male pedophiles than heterosexual male pedophiles.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: serg271
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- References:
- child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: u235bomb
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: Martin Leese
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: serg271
- child molester's disguised face unwound
- Prev by Date: Re: tracking moving objects
- Next by Date: Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- Previous by thread: Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- Next by thread: Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- Index(es):