Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: Martin Leese <please@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:12:10 GMT
ImageAnalyst wrote:
Well I do have Photoshop, and I just tried. I used +500 to twirl it
(got a really messed up face), then reverse twirled with -500 and,
surprisingly, it did a really good job of restoring the photo.
What happens when you reverse twirl the
child abuser's face at:
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=e0d7103b-62eb-48ed-a192-7097e6c6bbe7&k=4593
--
Regards,
Martin Leese
E-mail: please@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: ImageAnalyst
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- References:
- child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: u235bomb
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: Martin Leese
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: serg271
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: aruzinsky
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: serg271
- Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- From: ImageAnalyst
- child molester's disguised face unwound
- Prev by Date: Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- Next by Date: Re: face detection
- Previous by thread: Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- Next by thread: Re: child molester's disguised face unwound
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|