Re: applying theory of evidence by Dempster-Shafer in remote sensing image classification
- From: Larry <larry.cebuala@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 7, 8:28 pm, Jonathan Campbell <jg.campbell...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Guessing ---I do not have the paper, and I haven't bothered to revise my
D-S.
Image channel q = band q (confirmed somewhere else in your post).
If we have the values out of band q as xq E {0, 1, ... Lq -1}; (for
8-bit data Lq = 255).
You can estimate the conditional density pq(X = x, C = c) using the
histograms mentioned; c = class E {1, 2, ..., Nc}; Nc land-cover classes
in total.
You can use Bayes' rule to invert the conditionality; but you need to
assign a prior to each class, P(c).
p^q(C = c, Xq = xq) =
P(c) . pq(X = x, C = c)/ sum all c P(c) . pq(X = x, C = c)
The denominator (thing on the bottom) is just to normalise the probability..
Then, I guess, you combine the p^qs over each band q.
Of course, if you could estimate a proper multivariate density p(X = x,
C = c), etc. (X now a vector) and use just Bayes', you'd get a better
result.
Best regards,
Jon C.
All right. Thanks. A little bit clearer now.
Larry
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there anynone who knows a chatting site or someting like this?
- Next by Date: Re: zernike moments question
- Previous by thread: Re: applying theory of evidence by Dempster-Shafer in remote sensing image classification
- Next by thread: Re: Exact features matching from two aerial photos - for change detection
- Index(es):
Loading