a tube, or not a tube: that is the question
- From: mauro <mauro.australia@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 03:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
I got a 3d binary image, with one big structure connected.
This big structure is formed by different sub-structures (for
simplicity lets say: balls, tubes, ellipses, torus, and so on).
And I want to retrieve the original structures.
Unfortunately I do not know the size of the structures, but I know
(more or less) the proportion: a tube is bigger then another of a
factor 2/3.
Let's simplify: actually I need only the tubes ;-)
knowing the minimum and maximum size would be easy (smoothing with a
kernel of size greater then maximum and subtracting from the
original), but I don't know the sizes.
I was thinking to work with eigenvectors, but also with eigenvectors
this is a (reasonably) easy problem if the size of the tubes is (less
or more) known. Am I right? But the size is actually unknown...
well... it is in a range, but the range is quite wide (from 2 voxels
to 40, it doesn't help at all!!)
Any suggestion?
cheers,
Mauro
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a tube, or not a tube: that is the question
- From: ImageAnalyst
- Re: a tube, or not a tube: that is the question
- Prev by Date: Re: simulating non-uniform subpixel shift / phase correlation
- Next by Date: find largest cluster?
- Previous by thread: Re: simulating non-uniform subpixel shift / phase correlation
- Next by thread: Re: a tube, or not a tube: that is the question
- Index(es):