Re: Accurate edge detection?

On 2 Aug, 10:32, Andrew_M <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I haven't lost interest.  I don't understand illywacker's sarcasm of
"true researcher."  It would make more sense if he said "pure
researcher."  Commercial applied research that cannot be published
because of its proprietary nature is still true research but not pure
research.  On the other hand, most papers published in electrical
engineering journals represent pure research in the sense that their
findings have no foreseeable practical use.  For engineers, that is
immoral hypocrisy that deserves sarcasm.  And, IEEE typically charges
$35 for you to buy a paper and then discover it is useless.  You can't
judge a paper by its abstract anymore than judge a book by its cover.

Well, if so, what d'you think about my attempt to revert
"irrevertible" transform?

'Inverting' an uninvertible transform is not a new thing. This is more
or less the definition of a so-called 'inverse problem'.

illywhacker;
.