On vs. Kun reading?
From: Bob Clark (bclark_at_NO_SPAMairmail.net)
Date: 06/07/04
- Next message: necoandjeff: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Previous message: Travers Naran: "Re: Conjucation of "to be""
- Next in thread: necoandjeff: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: necoandjeff: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: jim_breen_at_idontreadhotmail.com: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: Kevin Wayne Williams: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: Sceadu: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 22:05:37 -0500
I am starting to work on the kanji in earnest this week. I was reviewing my
kanji reference today and was noting the on and kun readings. How do I
determine when to use the on or the kun reading in a written document? How
do I determine where word boundaries are in a written Japanese sentence? It
looks like the particles are all in hiragana, Is this a correct observation?
I have noticed as many as 5 kanji in a row, can there be more than one word
represented with no breaks between the kanji by hiragana or spaces? I am
using Hadamitzky and Spahn's "Kanji & Kana" book. Is this a good book to
use for my initial study?
Regards,
Bob
- Next message: necoandjeff: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Previous message: Travers Naran: "Re: Conjucation of "to be""
- Next in thread: necoandjeff: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: necoandjeff: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: jim_breen_at_idontreadhotmail.com: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: Kevin Wayne Williams: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: Sceadu: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|