Re: On vs. Kun reading?
jim_breen_at_idontreadhotmail.com
Date: 06/07/04
- Next message: Kevin Wayne Williams: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Previous message: Konrad Den Ende: "Re: Conjucation of "to be""
- In reply to: Bob Clark: "On vs. Kun reading?"
- Next in thread: Charles Eicher: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: Charles Eicher: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 04:01:49 GMT
Bob Clark <bclark@no_spamairmail.net> dixit:
>I am starting to work on the kanji in earnest this week. I was reviewing my
>kanji reference today and was noting the on and kun readings. How do I
>determine when to use the on or the kun reading in a written document?
You mean when you are reading the document? Most of the time it will be
the on reading in multi-kanji compounds and the kun reading when the kanji
is solo, but there are exceptions to both of these, and cases like
$BBf=j(B where it is mixed. Practice is what it takes.
>How
>do I determine where word boundaries are in a written Japanese sentence?
By practice and the acquisition of a grounding in grammar and a large
vocabulary. Cheer up; it's a non-trivial problem. In NLP it was thought to
be a Very Hard Problem until Nagao et al. came out with Juman and showed
that it wasn't really so hard after all. Not having rigid ideas about the
concept of "word" helps.
>It
>looks like the particles are all in hiragana, Is this a correct observation?
For the documents you are likely to be reading; yes.
>I have noticed as many as 5 kanji in a row, can there be more than one word
>represented with no breaks between the kanji by hiragana or spaces?
Yes. The typical Japanese "multi-word expression", to use the tag from
linguistics, often consists of a string of kanji. As you get used to it
they'll seem OK. Newspaper headlines are the ultimate. They often leave
out particles and even toss out extraneous kanji if the original compound
can be deduced from the remnants.
>I am
>using Hadamitzky and Spahn's "Kanji & Kana" book. Is this a good book to
>use for my initial study?
Dunno. Never used it.
-- Jim Breen http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/ Computer Science & Software Engineering, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia $B%8%`!&%V%j!<%s(B@$B%b%J%7%eBg3X(B
- Next message: Kevin Wayne Williams: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Previous message: Konrad Den Ende: "Re: Conjucation of "to be""
- In reply to: Bob Clark: "On vs. Kun reading?"
- Next in thread: Charles Eicher: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Reply: Charles Eicher: "Re: On vs. Kun reading?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|